@Aniya wants a wiki ???? I was mostly talking about photos, videos, music, and such. Also this discussion happened about a month ago. I don't really get your comment. If you would care to elaborate?
@Vintagesun Not to intrude on your conversation, but you can contact TheInternetTombRaider and TeaOverLord through their message wall on this wiki. Just type in their users and when you go into their account there should be a tab labeled "Message Wall." As you may have guessed, it is pretty much self explanatory from there.
Ohh theres a whole thing for that
Oh alright :)
@Aspect of the Morning star Wait I thought they wanted aesthetics that dont include witchcraft??
@Aspect of the Morning star But anyways, based off of what was written Romantic Goth seems like an aesthetic that incorporates roses. Roses and romance in general have been intertwined since the Shakespeare days, and sadder romances or themes had an emphasis on the thorns or dying roses. Like in Beauty and the Beast a rose represented a benediction. Which is why I thought of Romantic Goth having a darker twist to a rose-based aesthetic.
Oh wait sorry your reply didnt load for me haha
Huh?
@Aspect of the Morning star I thought it sounded sort of like the 'tiktok' version of grunge. Though as I said in my post that devilcore would be my first guess, I have seen people whose aesthetic is grunge, incorporate those sorts of things in their posts (style, hair, etc.)
Thanks for your concern though :)
I have seen images similar to those sort of things but there are not that many aesthetics that include roses and such on this wiki. You may have stumbled upon a new aesthetic, though before creating a page I advise you to see the opinions of experts or the Admins. Romantic Goth would be my first guess though.
Maayybbee this aesthetic(at the mention of roses growing out of limbs and stuff, sounds kind of dark to me). But be warned, this aesthetic includes blood, murderous themes, etc. if those things make you woozy, or feel sick DO NOT view this page.
Would alice in wonderland fall under the ethereal aesthetic or something else???
I dont realllyyy know but i feel like its kinda like a concept of weirdcore because its not really logical and things happen as they would in a fever dream. Like things that aren't directly related to eachother like the cat, the rabbit, the worm, the flowers, and the queen just happen. (you get what im saying right????)
@OnlyLadyHydra Ok thanks! I contacted TheInternetTombRaider and I am trying to see if it can get revamped as a subgenre. Now that I have pondered on it more, you were right on it being a subgenre of Weirdcore.
Seriously, you helped me a bunch so thanks for that! Hope you have a great rest of your day!!!!
Best,
Natalie :)
@Nonameshadowperson Haha np hope you found one that fits you!
@OnlyLadyHydra Oh also was the Soft Weirdcore page deleted because it did not have enough information? Or because the admins did not feel that it had enough defining features to be its own aesthetic??
Also can I contact them through their message wall with follow up questions?
Hah sorry for throwing a lot at you there, thanks though.
@OnlyLadyHydra Ok thanks, but if I was to suggest the Asic Girl aesthetic to someone in the future it would be a subgenre of VSCO or Art Hoe??? Or is the information from Asic Girl just added in to sections of those pages.
Probably Devilcore I don't know of any other ones that don't include witchcraft.
Hope this helped! :)
I get what you are describing, and I think that its most likely devilcore, if anything. I listed extra ones though, just in case.
@Aspect of the Morning star I do think that a misunderstanding occurred with the recollection of my words. I am not claiming that users are making a personal aesthetic. It has little, if nothing to do with what I had said. But rather explaining that aesthetics are being created without many pictures; and given that, are hard to understand. They have many words and explanations, yet no solid examples to view and/or listen to. And recalling my reference to the blind men and elephant, you cannot wholly understand an aesthetic without examples. Countless times when exploring this wiki, I have come across pages with quite interesting history and such; but with little to no pictures to show what the aesthetic is. Imagine Cottagecore (a quite popular and in depth page) without pictures, you would have an understanding of it to some theoretical point. But in order to adapt and fully understand the aesthetic, you must have examples and photos to get a feel for it. And to acknowledge your point that the viewer can make a google search, well I beg to differ for one reason alone.
To put it simply, if an aesthetic was discovered and then 'created' or put together on this wiki, there are no examples under the name of that aesthetic. For example in my search for photos that go under the aesthetic page that I created, most photos were an accidental occurrence. With unintentional bad lighting, etc. which made it 'aesthetic.' So to further explain, some photos that would go under an aesthetic would not show up in a query on Google (based off of it's search engine function)
I never claimed these things to be a matter a fact or endgame. I was just reporting what I had noticed frequently, and decided to voice my concerns and find out if anyone else was noticing the same issues.
And when writing that 'post' I did not claim that this was a "dire" issue. I believe that with something so reliant on visuals on an information source such as this wiki, there should be more photos or some form of other media.
